Recent Posts
- MySQL Replication skip record
- Reset Blackberry contact list
- Mac mail attachments preview
- [Note] Slave I/O thread: Failed reading log event, reconnecting to retry, log ‘server-bin.000001′ at postion
- Google Apps BES Connector : Invalid Credentials. Please try again
- Create ISO in MacOS
- Delete all OSSIM incidents
- Issues with FTP on CentOS 5.4
- Missing “sync with google” on mac os 10.5.8 address book
- Clean up your mac caches
Tag Cloud
Admin CentoOS CentOS cibadmin Cluster Clustering Command Line crm CSV DRBD Firefox FreeBSD IDS LDAP Linux Linux-HA Mac Mail Servers Memory NFS nginx Office 2007 Openvpn OSSIM Perl Qmail Qmail-Tls Security Sendmail SIEM snow leopard ssh svn sysadmin Sys Admin Toaster Tweak Unix Vista VMware vmware fusion Windows XP YumArchives
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- September 2006
- May 2006


Argh, this is driving me crazy,
This is not working for me. It works if I add “umask 002″ to /etc/launchd.conf, but obviously I don’t want that for all processes.
Can anyone think of why it wouldn’t be working in launchd-user.conf???
Okay, jumped the gun asking for help. For some reason the launchd-user.conf file I created wasn’t displaying the .conf extension, even though it was shown on get info. Strange. Anyway after recreating the file it worked.
But now, I’m confused over what it’s doing:
I thought umask was only suppossed to restrict permissions but they would still be granted based on the enclosing folders permissions. Is this not correct?
Now with umask 002 set everything created in a folder with 700 permissions is created with 774. I know others won’t have access to the folder anyway, but it’s not how I thought it would behave.
Any thoughts? Thanks.
The goal of this change is to allow users who share a mac to be able to create files/folders and have other users access them.